E-ISSN 2146-8354
 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement



Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

 

Editorial and Peer Review Processes generally follow these steps:

The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for our journal "Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology".
It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer(s) and the publisher.
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions
The editor of the GR is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Editor, Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology

 
 

Last updated: October 06, 2016 07:30:01



Most Viewed Articles
  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358

  • Oral medicine and radiology- the Indian scenario
    Shishir Ram Shetty, Mansib M Shaik, Subhas G Babu
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 59-61
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121220032624

  • Non scholae sed vitae discimus (Not for school but for life we learn): Thoughts on the traditional lecture in medical education
    Thomas Efferth
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 69-72
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121738

  • Knowledge, attitude & practices of medical students and teachers towards clinical research in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai – cross sectional survey
    Dinesh K Dhodi, Karan B Thakkar, Gauri Billa, Akash A Khobragade, Shyamal R Sinha, Sadiq B Patel
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 238-244
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130608045519

  • The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students
    Amy Wachholtz, MaiLan Rogoff
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 83-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130104060612

  • The use of mind maps as support in medical education
    Virgílio Vasconcelos Vilela, Lilian Carla Pereira Barbosa, Ana Luisa Miranda-Vilela, Leopoldo Luiz Santos Neto
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 199-206
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130407082647

  • Five-year trend of competitiveness and knowledge-gaining attitude of university students; Evaluation based on an event of continuing health sciences education
    Fujio Takayama, Yoshiko Amikura, Sudhakar John, Vidyasagar Devaprasad Dedeepiya, Rajappa Senthilkumar, Govindan Venkataramani, Kottoorathu Mammen Cherian, Hajib Naraharirao Madhavan, David W Green, Masahiko Matsumoto, Shoji Suzuki, Masaru Iwasaki, Senthilkumar Preethy , Samuel JK Abraham
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 92-99
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130115055107

  • Biochemistry handouts covering all lecture topics as study guide to focus during exam preparation in first year medical undergraduates in India
    Mamata Vishnu Hegde, Sarita Vijay Agrawal, Parduman Singh, Samir Anil Singru
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 33-39
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121113112005

  • Use of non-standard abbreviations and symbols in medical prescriptions: implications for patients' health
    Tamayo Rodríguez M, González Valverde FM, Pérez-Fernández P, Madrigal de Torres M, Pérez Cárceles MD, Osuna Carrillo de Albornoz E
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 54-58
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121113112507

  • Comparing the borderline group and borderline regression approaches to setting Objective Structured Clinical Examination cut scores
    Katharine Jane Reid, Agnes Dodds
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(1): 8-12
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130921013523

  • Most Downloaded
  • Oral medicine and radiology- the Indian scenario
    Shishir Ram Shetty, Mansib M Shaik, Subhas G Babu
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 59-61
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121220032624

  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358

  • Five-year trend of competitiveness and knowledge-gaining attitude of university students; Evaluation based on an event of continuing health sciences education
    Fujio Takayama, Yoshiko Amikura, Sudhakar John, Vidyasagar Devaprasad Dedeepiya, Rajappa Senthilkumar, Govindan Venkataramani, Kottoorathu Mammen Cherian, Hajib Naraharirao Madhavan, David W Green, Masahiko Matsumoto, Shoji Suzuki, Masaru Iwasaki, Senthilkumar Preethy , Samuel JK Abraham
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 92-99
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130115055107

  • Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents
    Ramzan Shahid, Jerold Stirling, William Adams
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2016; 4(4): 153-158
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20170116015415

  • The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students
    Amy Wachholtz, MaiLan Rogoff
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 83-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130104060612

  • The use of mind maps as support in medical education
    Virgílio Vasconcelos Vilela, Lilian Carla Pereira Barbosa, Ana Luisa Miranda-Vilela, Leopoldo Luiz Santos Neto
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 199-206
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130407082647

  • Knowledge, attitude & practices of medical students and teachers towards clinical research in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai – cross sectional survey
    Dinesh K Dhodi, Karan B Thakkar, Gauri Billa, Akash A Khobragade, Shyamal R Sinha, Sadiq B Patel
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 238-244
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130608045519

  • Comparing the borderline group and borderline regression approaches to setting Objective Structured Clinical Examination cut scores
    Katharine Jane Reid, Agnes Dodds
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(1): 8-12
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130921013523

  • Factors affecting performance of first year medical students in Bhopal, India
    Shubho Subrata Biswas, Vaishali Jain
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 192-197
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130409044053

  • Biochemistry handouts covering all lecture topics as study guide to focus during exam preparation in first year medical undergraduates in India
    Mamata Vishnu Hegde, Sarita Vijay Agrawal, Parduman Singh, Samir Anil Singru
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 33-39
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121113112005

  • Most Cited Articles
  • The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students
    Amy Wachholtz, MaiLan Rogoff
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 83-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130104060612
    Cited : 14 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Building a theoretically grounded model to support the design of effective non-technical skills training in healthcare: The SECTORS model
    Morris Gordon
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 77-82
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121217125557
    Cited : 6 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Perceptions of Personalized Medicine in an Academic Health System: Educational Findings
    Allison Vorderstrasse, Sara Huston Katsanis, Mollie A Minear, Nancy Yang, Tejinder Rakhra-Burris, Jason W Reeves, Robert Cook-Deegan, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Leigh Ann Simmons
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2015; 3(1): 14-19
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20150408050414
    Cited : 5 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Health literacy practices of physicians and patient care personnel in a hospital setting
    Kadriye O. Lewis, Joan E Morgan, Lihshing Leigh Wang, Kathleen Calderon, Jennifer Rammel, Murat Ozer
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(4): 204-212
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20141122081418
    Cited : 5 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358
    Cited : 4 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Correlation of high school exam grades with study success at a German medical school
    Ozan Yüksel Tektas, Cornelia Fiessler, Andreas Mayr, Winfried Neuhuber, Friedrich Paulsen
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 157-162
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130311114703
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Why a teacher centered medical school curriculum may result in a poor educational environment?
    Eiad Abdelmohsen AlFaris, Naghma Naeem , Sean McAleer, Riaz Qureshi, Cees van der Vleuten, Farhana Irfan , Amr Jamal
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(2): 85-90
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20140620013233
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Teaching behaviour change skills to undergraduate medical students
    Ian Grey, Bayan Al Saihati
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 231-237
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20131105073307
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Medical students' perception on anatomy knowledge relevance and retention during clerkship
    Nihal Mohamed Nabil, Najwa Al-Mously, Shahad AlWathnani, Asrar Abduldaiem, Hadeel Al-Issa
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(3): 147-151
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20140928035119
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Virtual Mrs K: The learners’ expectations and attitudes towards a virtual patient system in transcultural psychiatry
    Ioannis Pantziaras, Uno Fors, Solvig Ekblad
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(2): 109-115
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20140627042240
    Cited : 2 times [Click to see citing articles]