E-ISSN 2146-8354
 

Peer Review Policy



Peer Review Policy

The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards Review Policy and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Initial manuscript evaluation

The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review.

Type of Peer Review

Policy employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process.

How the referee is selected

Whenever possible, referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated.

Referee reports

Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work.

Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

How long does the review process take?

The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. Should the referee's reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. The Editor's decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the referees, which usually includes verbatim comments by the referees. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial referees who may then request another revision of a manuscript.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.

Editor's Decision is final

Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.



Most Viewed Articles
  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358

  • Oral medicine and radiology- the Indian scenario
    Shishir Ram Shetty, Mansib M Shaik, Subhas G Babu
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 59-61
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121220032624

  • Non scholae sed vitae discimus (Not for school but for life we learn): Thoughts on the traditional lecture in medical education
    Thomas Efferth
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 69-72
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121738

  • Knowledge, attitude & practices of medical students and teachers towards clinical research in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai – cross sectional survey
    Dinesh K Dhodi, Karan B Thakkar, Gauri Billa, Akash A Khobragade, Shyamal R Sinha, Sadiq B Patel
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(4): 238-244
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130608045519

  • The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students
    Amy Wachholtz, MaiLan Rogoff
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 83-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130104060612

  • Most Downloaded
  • Communication skills for medical students – An overview
    Ramesh Ramasamy, Sathish Babu Murugaiyan, Rachel Shalini, Kuzhandai Velu Vengadapathy, Niranjan Gopal
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2014; 2(2): 134-140
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20140321110500

  • Oral medicine and radiology- the Indian scenario
    Shishir Ram Shetty, Mansib M Shaik, Subhas G Babu
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(1): 59-61
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121220032624

  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358

  • Five-year trend of competitiveness and knowledge-gaining attitude of university students; Evaluation based on an event of continuing health sciences education
    Fujio Takayama, Yoshiko Amikura, Sudhakar John, Vidyasagar Devaprasad Dedeepiya, Rajappa Senthilkumar, Govindan Venkataramani, Kottoorathu Mammen Cherian, Hajib Naraharirao Madhavan, David W Green, Masahiko Matsumoto, Shoji Suzuki, Masaru Iwasaki, Senthilkumar Preethy , Samuel JK Abraham
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 92-99
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130115055107

  • Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents
    Ramzan Shahid, Jerold Stirling, William Adams
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2016; 4(4): 153-158
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20170116015415

  • Most Cited Articles
  • The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students
    Amy Wachholtz, MaiLan Rogoff
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 83-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130104060612
    Cited : 22 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Perceptions of Personalized Medicine in an Academic Health System: Educational Findings
    Allison Vorderstrasse, Sara Huston Katsanis, Mollie A Minear, Nancy Yang, Tejinder Rakhra-Burris, Jason W Reeves, Robert Cook-Deegan, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Leigh Ann Simmons
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2015; 3(1): 14-19
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20150408050414
    Cited : 9 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school
    Najwa Al-Mously, Raneem Salem, Nasser Al-Hamdan
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(3): 170-176
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20130226121358
    Cited : 8 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Building a theoretically grounded model to support the design of effective non-technical skills training in healthcare: The SECTORS model
    Morris Gordon
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2013; 1(2): 77-82
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20121217125557
    Cited : 8 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents
    Ramzan Shahid, Jerold Stirling, William Adams
    J Contemp Med Edu. 2016; 4(4): 153-158
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/jcme.20170116015415
    Cited : 7 times [Click to see citing articles]